Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (ISSN:&nbsp;2394-1111)</strong>&nbsp;aims to publish high quality papers (<a href="/index.php/JAMPS/general-guideline-for-authors">Click here for Types of paper</a>) in all areas of&nbsp;Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences.&nbsp;By not excluding papers based on novelty, this journal facilitates the research and wishes to publish papers as long as they are technically correct and scientifically motivated. The journal also encourages the submission of useful reports of negative results. This is a quality controlled, OPEN peer-reviewed, open-access INTERNATIONAL journal.</p> SCIENCEDOMAIN international en-US Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2394-1111 Integrating Clinical, Operational, and Financial Data to Improve Project Outcomes in Digital Health Programs: A Critical Review https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS/article/view/885 <p>Digital health programmes are commonly monitored through separate clinical, operational and financial reporting systems. This fragmentation obscures whether a programme that is technically delivered and operationally adopted also improves patient outcomes, distributes benefits equitably and produces affordable, sustainable value. This critical narrative review examines how integrated use of the three data domains can strengthen project governance, implementation learning and benefits realisation. Literature published from 1 January 2005 to 1 June 2026 was identified through accessible scholarly indexes, citation searching and verification against authoritative bibliographic records. Evidence from learning health systems, health informatics, process mining, implementation science, economic evaluation and project governance was appraised and synthesised thematically. The evidence indicates that integration improves observability: it can connect workflow changes, resource use and clinical consequences, expose bottlenecks and unintended effects, and support earlier corrective action. Interoperability standards, common data models and integrated repositories are enabling conditions, but technical linkage alone does not produce decision-ready evidence. Reliable interpretation also requires aligned denominators and time windows, traceable provenance, explicit causal assumptions, baseline or counterfactual comparisons, benefit ownership and governance capable of reconciling conflicting objectives. Clinical measures are often incomplete or weakly attributable; operational measures may reward throughput without reflecting outcomes; and financial measures frequently omit implementation burden, opportunity costs, maintenance and the distribution of costs and benefits. Consequently, evidence that integrated data directly cause superior long-term programme outcomes remains limited, despite stronger evidence for improved measurement, learning and operational control. An evidence-informed programme model is proposed in which technical outputs are linked sequentially to implementation outcomes, clinical and service outcomes, financial value, equity and sustainability. Future research should test this model prospectively across multiple sites using standardised measures, patient- or episode-level cost-outcome linkage, causal evaluation designs and explicit assessment of equity and organisational burden.</p> Bashiru Ibrahim Jane Sharon Akinyemi Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2026-08-10 2026-08-10 28 9 1 19 10.9734/jamps/2026/v28i9885 Governance and Performance Dashboards for Managing Healthcare Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Implementation Projects in Hospital Systems: A Critical Review https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS/article/view/888 <p>Hospital systems are adopting predictive analytics and artificial intelligence at a pace that has outstripped the development of the organisational machinery required to supervise them. Two bodies of scholarship have grown in parallel to address this problem. The first proposes governance frameworks that specify principles, lifecycle stages, decision points and oversight bodies for artificial intelligence adoption. The second, considerably older, examines performance dashboards as instruments for making clinical and operational performance visible and actionable within hospitals. These literatures rarely engage with one another, and the practical consequence is that governance frameworks specify what ought to be overseen without establishing how oversight is instrumented, while the dashboard literature describes display and feedback mechanisms without addressing the distinctive properties of algorithmic systems that degrade silently, distribute performance unevenly across patient subgroups and depend on outcome labels that arrive long after predictions are made. This critical review examines the intersection of these fields, drawing on peer-reviewed literature identified through structured searching of bibliographic metadata registries and biomedical indexes to 1 June 2026. Five arguments are developed. Governance frameworks remain concentrated at the level of principles, with oversight mechanisms the least frequently specified component. The indicator base for algorithmic performance is dominated by discrimination metrics whose selection is seldom justified and which are poorly aligned with the decisions that governance bodies actually make. Evidence that dashboards improve care is suggestive rather than conclusive, derives largely from non-algorithmic quality improvement contexts, and depends heavily on how feedback is designed and embedded in organisational routines. Post-deployment monitoring of deployed models is constrained by label latency, by the absence of agreed thresholds for action and by the cost of ground-truth ascertainment. Generative and ambient applications are stretching an oversight model constructed for discrete risk-scoring tools. Priorities for research include comparative evaluation of oversight architectures, development of decision-relevant indicator sets, and prospective study of dashboards as governance interventions rather than as reporting artefacts.</p> Ododoade Idowu Adewuyi Moshood Khairah Olayinka Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2026-08-18 2026-08-18 28 9 39 60 10.9734/jamps/2026/v28i9888 Glucagon in Endocrine and Metabolic Practice: A Critical Narrative Review of Stimulation Testing, Diagnostic Cut-points and Therapeutic Use in Children, Adolescents and Adults https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS/article/view/889 <p class="FirstParagraph" style="margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 8.5pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">Glucagon occupies an unusual position in clinical endocrinology. The same 29-amino-acid peptide serves as a provocative agent for pituitary function testing, as an emergency treatment for severe hypoglycaemia, as a continuous infusion in hyperinsulinaemic states of infancy, and, through receptor co-agonism, as a component of the newest generation of cardiometabolic drugs. These applications have developed in parallel, largely within separate literatures, and the assumptions that underpin them have rarely been examined together. This review evaluates the evidence accumulated over approximately a quarter of a century on the glucagon stimulation test and on therapeutic glucagon across the paediatric and adult lifespan, with particular attention to the derivation, transportability and validity of diagnostic cut-points. Evidence was identified through structured searching of biomedical and bibliographic sources and appraised for design adequacy, reference-standard quality, sample size, assay dependence and generalisability. Three findings dominate the synthesis. First, the growth hormone cut-point for the glucagon stimulation test is not a fixed biological threshold but a function of dose regimen, adiposity, glucose tolerance, age and assay calibration; the widely used threshold of 3 µg/L overdiagnoses deficiency in overweight adults, and the proposed alternative of 1 µg/L rests on small validation cohorts. Second, the corticotroph read-out from the same test performs considerably less well than the somatotroph read-out, and several independent series show a broad indeterminate zone in which the test cannot classify patients reliably. Third, therapeutic glucagon has been transformed by stable ready-to-use formulations and by the analogue dasiglucagon, with randomised evidence in severe hypoglycaemia, congenital hyperinsulinism and post-bariatric hypoglycaemia, although comparative effectiveness data and long-term paediatric safety data remain sparse. Priorities include multicentre cut-point validation stratified by body mass index and assay platform, harmonised cortisol thresholds, and adequately powered comparisons between glucagon formulations in real-world hypoglycaemia.</span></p> Ashraf T. Soliman Fawzia Alyafei Nada Alaaraj Noor Hamed Shayma Ahmed Nada Soliman Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2026-08-19 2026-08-19 28 9 61 83 10.9734/jamps/2026/v28i9889 Predictive ADMET Assessment and Molecular Docking Analysis of Fisetin for Its Immunomodulatory Potential https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS/article/view/886 <p><strong>Background:</strong> Immune-mediated diseases impose substantial clinical and socioeconomic burdens, while prolonged use of conventional immunosuppressive agents may be associated with serious adverse effects. Fisetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, but its interaction with FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12) remains insufficiently characterised.</p> <p><strong>Aim:</strong> This study aimed to evaluate the binding interaction of fisetin with FKBP12 and to assess its predicted absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties in comparison with tacrolimus.</p> <p><strong>Method:</strong> The three-dimensional structure of FKBP12 was prepared for molecular docking, while fisetin and tacrolimus were selected as ligands. Docking analysis was performed using AutoDock version 4.2.6. Drug-likeness, pharmacokinetic behaviour, and toxicity-related parameters were predicted using SwissADME and pkCSM.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Fisetin interacted with three FKBP12 binding sites, with predicted binding energies of −8.15, −7.92, and −5.62 kcal/mol. Tacrolimus showed corresponding binding energies of −10.29, −8.44, and −8.43 kcal/mol. Fisetin formed hydrogen-bond and hydrophobic interactions with several amino acid residues, including ARG18, GLU60, ALA64, PHE15, ARG13, and THR85. It showed no violation of Lipinski’s rule of five and had higher predicted gastrointestinal absorption than tacrolimus. No Ames toxicity, hERG inhibition, hepatotoxicity, or skin sensitisation was predicted for fisetin, although inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 was indicated.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Fisetin demonstrated plausible binding to FKBP12 and a comparatively favourable predicted ADMET profile. These findings provide preliminary computational support for further investigation, although biochemical, cellular, and in vivo validation is required before its immunomodulatory potential can be confirmed.</p> Rakesh Tirkey Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2026-08-17 2026-08-17 28 9 20 28 10.9734/jamps/2026/v28i9886 Development and Validation of New Analytical Method for Determination of Particle Size Distribution in Alogliptin Benzoate Drug Substance Using Laser-based Particle Size Analyzer https://www.journaljamps.com/index.php/JAMPS/article/view/887 <p>Particle size distribution (PSD) characterisation is important for pharmaceutical drug-substance quality because particle size can influence formulation-related performance. This study developed and validated a wet-dispersion laser-diffraction method for determining the PSD of Alogliptin Benzoate using the Malvern Mastersizer 3000 (Ultra Plus). Methanol, chloroform, and liquid paraffin light were evaluated during method development, and liquid paraffin light was selected as the dispersion medium. The optimised measurement conditions included a particle refractive index of 1.50, dispersant refractive index of 1.468, sample absorption value of 1.0, obscuration of 10–20%, stirrer speed of 2000 rpm, and sonication for 45 seconds. Method performance was assessed using Dᵥ10, Dᵥ50, and Dᵥ90 through precision, intermediate precision, and robustness studies. Method precision produced %RSD values of 3.00%, 2.47%, and 3.91% for D(0.1), D(0.5), and D(0.9), respectively. Intermediate precision gave corresponding %RSD values of 3.46%, 3.40%, and 8.77%. The cumulative %RSD values for method and intermediate precision were 3.21%, 3.30%, and 6.80%, respectively. Robustness was evaluated by deliberate changes in stirrer speed, obscuration range, and sonication time, with the reported results remaining within the stated acceptance criteria. The developed procedure therefore demonstrated consistent performance under the conditions evaluated and is suitable for routine particle size determination of Alogliptin Benzoate drug substance in quality control laboratories.</p> Jitendra Kumar Dubey Jitendra Koundinya Babul Nishad Praveen Choubay Nirav Parekh Mehul Gujrati Pankaj T. Shah Frenil Vaidya Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2026-08-18 2026-08-18 28 9 29 38 10.9734/jamps/2026/v28i9887